It's the game show where an answer is given: "The Father of Our Country; he didn't really chop down a cherry tree" and a short question is to be given by the contestant: "Who is George Washington?" So this involves using language, understanding and knowledge to get the solution.
IBM took the challenge of making a computer system that could compete, like a human player, in this game. It's called WATSON. It sits like a contestant and gets its input as a text file and processes it itself - no outside internet access or human intervention. And the results were amazing.
This brings an interesting question. What does it mean to understand something? Right now what WATSON is doing is looking all the word in the answer given up in its database and assigning a probabilty to the correct question. Outside the system it looks like the system understands it. But imagine WATSON played Jeopardy! in Chinese. And imagine instead of a computer running the program it was a non-chinese speaking person running the program by hand. It takes in Chinese characters as input, processes it by hand according to the program, and outputs Chinese. Would you say that the human understood Chinese?
AI. It's still a young field.
ReplyDeletenice post, WATSON really is an important step to human-level AI. It is still very narrow AI, but it's ways of "understanding" language are almost revolutionary.
ReplyDeleteFrom watching Jeopardy last night, Watson still has a way to go...
ReplyDeletewow thats an amazing piece of technology!
ReplyDeleteI've read about that thing. It's fucking amazing.
ReplyDeleteIt's a cool demonstration of computing and programming power....but as you say it's just a series of instructions with no real understanding
ReplyDeleteHm interesting. Philosophical question, for which I really don't have an answer.
ReplyDeleteI would say no, although I don't really have a reason...
Heard about this, hopefully it doesn't bite us in the ass.
ReplyDeletethat sounds awesome
ReplyDeletelol iv seen it on the show, its sick
ReplyDeleteGood insight, it seems we're at the point where AI can beat humans at specific intelligence tasks where its more useful to have a wide range of data rather than the ability to analyse. I think we're way off computers having human-like intelligence though.
ReplyDeleteI don't really think that watson understands, but it looks like we are on our way to one day creating something that does!
ReplyDeleteWe're all doomed!
ReplyDeleteits kasparov all over again :[
ReplyDeleteYeah I was watching a special about this on PBS. I think it was NOVA. Pretty funny episode.
ReplyDeleteGIGO = garbage in, garbage out.
ReplyDeleteFascinating stuff. In the end it's not understanding, but assigning answers based on probability.
ReplyDeleteWith how intelligent programs are getting I must admit I'm not too surprised.
ReplyDeleteClever bit of tech, but needs abit more work I think.
ReplyDeleteI have got myself an old IBM pc, must boot it up once again
ReplyDeleteinteresting point. my CPU is old but is proccesing the information well
ReplyDelete"assigning answers based on probability" is what i did through high school and college...
ReplyDelete